Here is my direct response to David Vollmar following his legal threat and waffle justification that added no evidence to his already total lack of evidence!:
ME TO DAVID VOLLMAR
Of course, you start by attacking us instead of presenting credible evidence. Of course, I have the history of your emails to me and your previous legal threat.
As I have said, if you produce valid legal papers in a sensible jurisdiction I will come out to play. Just publish them and I will verify they are legitimate, then let the fun begin.
Please don't back down this time!! After your last legal threat did not materialise I was so disappointed.
David, you have nowhere to hide. You know HEDD1/Sniffex is a fraud but you are in too deep to get out. So we will get you out. You may find you are grateful in later life when you reflect on just what a despicable thing it was for you to pretend you could save lives, when in fact you put them at more risk.
Sorry, but the pathetic performance at the Thai test, and John White making an arse of himself on Newsnight simply prove what we knew anyway.
So, bring it on! I cannot wait to see you in Court!!
NOW. HERE IS HIS RESPONSE.IN RED. APOLOGIES FOR THE LONG DISSECTION, BUT ALWAYS USEFUL TO HIGHLIGHT ALL THE INCONSISTENCIES, EXCUSES AND GENERAL BS THEY KEEP TROTTING OUT! MY REBUTTAL IN RED.
Hello Harvey (as long as I don't know your real name, I will prefer to call you Harvey, my anonymous friend),
Seems David Vollmar is now further into fantasy land. Harvey? Oh well. have said a few rude things to him, and if that is the best insult he can come up with, hey, I'm a man. I can take it!
Our lawyer is copied to this message.
Oh good! Hoping so much for your legal paperwork! Soon? I have emailed your lawyer to confirm he is representing you. Also to ask a few relevant questions that might help him. Hope you don't mind? Is he really good, by the way? Think you need a miracle worker.
This will be my last message to you, as it is pure waste of time to communicate with an anonymous molester/ rabbit or as you seem to be, a giant white rat called Harvey!
Aha. more ad hominem attacks! That's against me, as opposed to my argument that the HEDD1 is a fraud. Diversionary tactics again. Damn. I am so diverted!
"anonymous"? I've said I'll face you in Court!
"molester"? Wait till prison David! Then you might find out about molestation!
"giant white rabbit/rat"? HMMMM...what if I am? Still right you are a fraud.
Your threats and infringements will be taken care off this time, you don't worry!
Well, apart from the fact that I am not at all worried, the sooner we get to Court, the sooner this can be sorted out. Proper papers in a proper jusrisdiction i.e. not somewhere lame, local or dodgy, and we are off to the races. May the best rat/rabbit win!
The performance in Thailand was not pathetic but the report was decontextualized because they only showed the last 10 minutes, when the room was contaminated after they have been constantly moving explosives inside the room. (PERFORMANCE, OR LACK OF, IS THE RIGHT WORD! DECONTEXTUALISED! BS! Why agree to the test then? You knew the conditions!)The first part of the test was very successful. (Where is the film of the first part of the test? Was that the bit where you know where th targets were? Usually excuse number 9 - Calibrating? BS? Where are the results? What exactly did it consist of? Can we replicate at a neutral location?) But the media wanted to go after GT200 and the paid bribes and the climate was poisoned. (NO! The media and everyone with an ounce of morality wanted to properly check all claims by all the similar frauds!) The same result would have happened with a K9 or trace detector. (NOT TRUE! Un-supported!) It was certainly our mistake to agree on another test but the pressure coming from a room full of press was quite big.(AAAAHHHHHH! POOR BABY! YOU KNOW THE HISTORY OF SNIFFEX. ALWAYS FAILS WHEN TESTED PROPERLY. THE RECORDS ARE THERE FOR ALL TO SEE. IT'S AN HARD WORLD MATE!) Blame us for this but we have only tried to support our local partner, who had invested a lot to get a change at all to work against the prejudice. By the way, from outside the room we have had the right reading but not from inside. But hey, we are learning from our mistakes! AAAAHHHH More sympathy vote. Not from me mate! Outside the room? Come on David! That's just crap! You know it. We can settle this in Court or on neutral territroy, say a major Physics Department at a Major University? Either way I am happy!
You know the history if Sniffex at tests. Funny, It fails every time. And every time you have excuses. Funny, you use the same ones Paul Johnson at Sniffex Inc in the USA used, even though you have denounced him before as a useless conman. Markov was also involved in that fraud and the SEC case. How come you still bought Sniffex rights from TASC, Markovs company? And you claim HEDD1 and Sniffex are different and work! HA!
What you have not understood is that we are also working against elements in this business, who are selling equipment that apparently does not work well/ at all and who have obviously been paying bribes in order to get an acceptance for their equipment. If HEDD1 worked as you claim, it is a simple matter to set up the appropriate, replicable, controlled double blind tests to prove it. We have offered this many times. On neutral ground, with neutral testers. And you can still be the operator! You accepted a long time back, but have never followed through. WHY? Competing in this kind of environment is quite difficult! GOOD! IT SHOULD BE WHEN YOU MAKE EXTRAORDINARY CLAIMS TO SAVE LIVES AND HAVE NOT PROVED IT! What you have also not understood is that HEDD1 is only one part of our product range. Look at the whole portfolio with very innovative and high-end products. So What! Some rights do not right your wrong! And selling useless detection equipment in EOD, or any scenario for that matter, is a nasty and despicable fraud. HEDD1 is useless. Ergo...Do you think we would risk our reputation and our commercial basis with one product only? We are not crazy but know of the great value of our technology as part of a multi-level-security concept. I think you got fooled by Markov or his friends originally. Lots of people get fooled by ideomotor. I've seen it. It can look very convincing. BUT! I also think you have had more than enough chance to get proper testing done by now. You have failed to do so. Simple! Now you are in so deep you cannot back out. Yes. Legal action is really your only alternative, but it exposes your lies more. So you are really trapped now.
You seem to forget, who our clients are?! Governmental organizations! As much as it hurts us but we cannot publish certain references and information, as our clients simply decline this!
I think we will label this excuse Number 4 on the list that the fraudsters use. there's more to come in this email, but let's examine this for a moment. If HEDD1/Sniffex is so good, you would get easy investment following proper testing, to get the best possible patent protections Worldwide. You would be able to get the investmnet to get the best lawyers to protect those patents. You would be able to effectively have a licence to print money. Because you would have credible testing proving you were right. That way, you would sell millions, and many happy customers would be delighted to boast how many lives their wise purchase had saved. History shows us that conned customers do not willingly admit to their mistakes, except in a few honourable exceptions. You are not going to be one of those exceptions. You have had your chances to do that. hence why we will finish this with a checkmate to us.
We are publishing as much information as necessary (NONE SO FAR TO BACK UP YOUR CLAIMS!) and possible in order to protect our technology. This technology has been developed with private funds only, unlike many other technologies out there! (SO WHAT!) But in a commercial world you have to protect your IP, we have had to learn this! (EXCUSE NUMBER 1 ..In the real World, as opposed to the fantasy one David Vollmar inhabits, it is relatively easy to protect what would be a real miracle device if it worked! See getting investment in previous paragraph. Also, one can get tested without revealing the inner workings. It is perfectly possible to get tests done, and if they prove that it works, then anyone wanting to see the insides can be tied up in a legal non-disclosure contract. SIMPLE! But no. David, like Chuck Christensen at H3Tec, and all the rest, wants to do it the hard way.) For this reason we will only publish the core elements (ALREADY PROVED TO BE BULLSHIT. SEE BBC NEWSNIGHT) of the technology that will explain missing links, as soon as we can be sure that it is safe to do so! (When will that be? Under what conditions? More delaying tactics like the promise to get independent tests done 2 years ago!) You might understand this or not, this is the only reason! And we will certainly not participate in a honky-donky-paranormal-
So will you please look at the bigger picture and put your blinds off!! Start to accept that the world is three-dimensional, even if this makes things more complicated! Or do you really want to be among the few skeptics that still believe that the earth is a disc?
More ad hominem! Bigger picture. 3-D. ????? What is he on about? Does the HEDD1/Sniffex work? No! Will he get it properly tested? NO! Will we go to Court? I do hope so! With all my heart! Earth a disc? Come on David. You can't do better than that old chestnut? Here's a disc for you " Across 110th Street" Bobby Womack! What a song!
My offer to you: Come to Bonn, get a training with HEDD1 and work with the device. Make your judgement then! You should only talk about things that you know! (OH NO! GROAN! EXCUSE NUMBER 2...the old training and demonstration offer. Like legal threats I am collecting them as well. Have about 5 or 6 from various swivel fraudsters! When will you listen! Personal demonstrations are not science. Anecdotal testimony is not science. Why do you think eyewitness statements are now being seen as so potentially unreliable? People can be fooled easily! Or bribed! I am no fool, thank you! A bit daft sometimes maybe. But not a fool!) No bad feeling, if you come clean, we will forget your infringements and give you a chance to make the necessary differentiation. (OH. THANKS DAVID! THAT'S KIND OF YOU. HOW THOUGHTFUL? NO BAD FEELINGS EH? TELL THAT TO THE VICTIMS OF THE FAILURE OF THE HEDD1/SNIFFEX, ADE651, GT200, ALPHA 6 ETC, YOU CONMAN!) Otherwise things are clear and we will not hesitate to walk the extra mile to stop your smearing, by law!
GO FOR IT. YOU WIMPED OUT BEFORE, DAMN YOU! PLEASE, NOT AGAIN THIS TIME! THIS TIME LET ME WIPE YOU OUT ONCE AND FOR ALL. PLEASE, YOU SNIVELLING SWIVELLING, AERIAL FRAUD SELLER. YOU RIDICULOUS LITTLE CRIMINAL. YOU BLUSTERING BERK. YOU COWARDLY CUR. YOU DERANGED DOG. YOU ARROGANT ASS. YOU ERRANT EXCREMENT. YOU FELONIOUS FRAUD. YOU GRUESOME GARGOYLE. YOU HATEFUL HUCKSTER. YOU IGNORANT IMBECILE. YOU JUMBLED UP JERK. YOU KILLER AND KLUTZ. YOU LOATHESOME LYING LOUSE. YOU MORONIC MANIAC. YOU NASTY NOSE SNOT. YOU ODIOUS OIK. YOU POSTURING PRAT. YOU RAPACIOUS RASCAL. YOU SOILED SCOUNDREL. YOU TOADY THIEF. YOU UNLIKEABLE URN OF POO. YOU VERMINOUS VULTURE. YOU WEARISOME W****R. YOU XXXXXXX XXXX. YOU YELLOW BELLIED YERMAN. YOU ZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZ ZZZ ZZZZZZZZ (What I said there is not for young eyes! Sorry!) Now how's that for some actionable insults David? White rabbit. Harvey. Come on!
All that goes for the Sniffex 'inventor' Yuri Markov at TASC in Bulgaria, His ex-partners in Sniffex Inc, John Wyatt at SDS UK Limited, who represent HEDD1 Sniffex in the UK, (under investigation by the Police in the UK). Frank Trier at Unival. All other involved in Sniffex and HEDD1 in any way. FRAUDS ALL OF YOU! SUE ME MOFOS!
Enjoy your weekend! YOU ENJOY YOURS TOO DAVID! DRANK A TOAST TO THE TRUTH AND JUSTICE! YOU?
David
